Mandatory Human Chip Implants Essay

The idea of pauperisationful clement potato chip implants is wrong on so numerous different levels. not solo is on that point a major job about how it will affect the concealment of society, but also how much we go intot know about the perverse effects on the actual compassionatekind body. A nonher major concern is the exoteric screenlash that evoke be expect from all spectral bodies and communities. This is why we as a society must jump out up for what we mean is properly, and what is effective is that piece of musicdatory benevolent chip implants tail assembly non and will not be tolerated.One of the biggest issues with mandatory world chip implants is silence issues and concerns. M any(prenominal) questions now convey up whenever the topic arises. What agreement or body of government controls the entropy stored from these chips? Is the schooling stored in the chip inviolable and secure? Can my information be stolen and or sold? As of right now the w holly chip O.K. for kinds in a medical examination examination application is the Verichip. The Verichip is a chip alike(p) to the size of a grain of rice. It is a fairly simple device that consists of only a coiled wire and a hermetically sealed microchip in spite of appearance a glass casing. It uses the coil as an antenna to create a radio set prognostic that is unique. This unique signal can be transmitted and received to key out a persons medical records if they ar in more or less break of dire state in which they could not communicate efficiently.(Foster, Kenneth R. 2007,March)This could save so many lives in the medical field solely by pulling up a patients records and receiving this signal. In a perfect world this would work mighty and only for good intentions but, the way we as a society constantly hand to streamline e genuinely aspect of our disembodied spirit, where would it run off? The notion or idea is that it would exchange drivers licenses or camber atm and debit cards. Social earnest numbers, birth certificates, bank account numbers, essentially your entire life. As technology continues to bewilder and advance, how secure can these chips actually be? If some genius was able to steal your signal they would be able to do so many functions with the information stored in it. Your life would be stolen in the b bring together of an eye. Also, another(prenominal) terrifying realization is if the signal is stolen or locked on to, you could be followed or tracked. This is very unsettling if we cannot be sure how safe this information really is. Would you really want mortalto know where you or your loved ones are at all times? What if some sick individual was watching your fry or children? The possibilities are endless in these scenarios. So with no guarantee on how secure the information stored in these chips really is, this is one of the many reasons why on that point should not be mandatory human chip implants.Another stron g arguing point on this candid is wellness concerns. With these devices being as small as they are, there is not enough data to prove that they are not a health concern. There is lots of data about these chips that should raise some eyebrows, as well as the manner in which they were approved by the FDA. Back in 2005 when the FDA approved human chip implants they claimed with fairish assurance the device was safe. The one thing they failed to mention in that claim was that studies deviation back to the mid-nineties directly colligate these chip implants with cancer. Many studies and question showed that one in six lab rats real tumors because of the engraft chip. So how could this slip by the FDA you ask? According to Lewan (2007), well back in 2005 when it was brought before the FDA for approval, the head of the part of Health and military man Services at the time which presided over the FDA, was a man by the name of Tommy Thompson. Well cardinal weeks after the approva l of the chip in creation, Thompson left his position at the DHHS to fabricate a board member of VeriChip Corp. and utilise Digital Solutions. Even though it was quintuple months later, he was compensated with cash and armoury options from the companies. Can we chalk this up as a coincidence? I male parentt think so. With all the facts and research done on this particular subject I find it hard to believe that the FDA did not come across any of this information before approving human chip implants. So with the data al define in front of us claiming to link these chips with cancer in lab rats, can we honestly agree to be deep-rooted ourselves?Finally, the thought or notion of human chip implants would cause a massive backlash in our religious communities. vertical recently in Virginia, there was a public outcry against mandatory micro-chipping that caused the residence of Representatives to vote on the subject matter. Krunkle , (2010) wrote, Del. scribble L. colewort (R-F redericksburg), the bills sponsor, is quoted adage My understanding Im not a theologian but theres a prophecy in the Biblethat consecrates youll have to receive a mark, or you can neither deprave nor sell things in end times, Cole said. Some people think these computing machine chips might be that mark.(p.1) In our society, theology is at times, a very polemic and touchy subject matter amidst religious communities. There will be millions of people who will become agitated if human chip implants become mandatory. Our demesne has so many different religious cultures that it would directly effect. Are we really ready for the consequences that will follow if this eventually happens?In conclusion, we as a society need to stand up to what we consider right from wrong. So is it wrong to make someone have a chip implanted so they can buy or sell things in order for them to go even though it goes against their religious beliefs? Or is it wrong for these chips to be approved for h umans even though there is tangible evidence that it could cause cancer. The answer is altogether up to us. My conclusion is that yes, it is completely wrong. Not only does it violate our ethical privacy rights as human beings, it also causes so many concerns medically and spiritually. We cannot allow this to come to fruition. We have to stand up for ourselves and our beliefs and say no to mandatory human chip implants to protect our future generations to come.ReferencesFoster, Kenneth R (2007, March) The dim ethics of implanted chips. IEEE spectrum. Retrieved from http//pages.cs.wisc.edu/markhill/cs252/Spring2013/handouts/spectrum07_rfid_ethics.pdf Holtzman, David H (2008). Human ID chips get under my skin, BusinessWeek Online, 5-5(1). Krunkle, Frederick (2010). Human chips seen by some in Virginia House as device of antichrist, The Lewan, Todd (2007). Chip implants linked to creature tumors, The Washington state of affairs Washington Post